Frequently asked
FAQ about Litigence
If your question isn't answered here, write to us — we'll come back with specifics for your workflow.
Does Litigence replace a lawyer?
No. Litigence is an intelligent assistant for the litigation team. It helps you analyse the case faster, see weak spots and draft documents — but the final decision, legal judgement and filing are always the lawyer's.
Does Litigence predict the court's ruling?
No. We do not position the product as a tool that predicts the outcome of a specific case or judge. Litigence improves the quality of position preparation, the evidence base and the argumentation. Its metrics are "position readiness", "evidence completeness" and "risk coverage" — not "chance of winning".
How is Litigence different from legal research databases?
Legal databases help you find statutes and case law. Litigence works at the next stage: it connects the materials of a specific case, the evidence, precedent and arguments into a single litigation position. It's not a replacement for a case-law database — it's a layer on top of one.
How is Litigence different from ChatGPT?
General-purpose AI is good with text but doesn't work in a specialised way with a litigation workflow. Litigence is built around case materials, verifiable sources, evidence gaps and the logic of preparing a position. Every key conclusion is linked to a specific fragment of a document.
Can I use real case materials?
Terms are agreed individually. Three scenarios are possible: working with anonymised documents, an isolated pilot environment under NDA, or a corporate environment built to the client's architecture.
Which disputes are supported at launch?
The first focus is commercial arbitration disputes: construction, supply, debt recovery, disputes over deliverables and documents. After that — insolvency, tax, corporate, insurance and banking disputes. The exact list for a pilot is agreed individually.
What do I get as output?
A map of facts and evidence, a list of evidence gaps, a set of verifiable case law, a risk map, a draft procedural document and a memo for the partner or head of practice. Every artefact is linked to its source.
Can I see a demo?
Yes. After your early-access request we'll contact suitable participants, run a short interview and show a private demo of Litigence on a scenario close to your workflow.
Who is Litigence not a fit for yet?
At this stage the product is not built for everyday consultations, mass templated documents, criminal defence, family, immigration or other tasks unrelated to preparing a litigation position in a commercial or arbitration dispute.
Didn't find your answer?
Tell us about your process — we'll come back with specifics and shape a pilot around your typical disputes.
Human legal review required before filing.