Trust · privacy · control

Security, verifiability and lawyer control

Litigence works with litigation materials — so the security architecture and terms of use are agreed individually with each client. Below are the current principles.

Data confidentiality

Case materials are treated as confidential client information. Access is restricted — only the pilot team and an explicitly agreed circle of people.

NDA

An NDA is signed before any pilot begins. Terms are agreed individually — our standard wording or the client's.

Working with materials

Different scenarios are possible: uploading anonymised documents, working in an isolated environment, or offline intake of materials on agreed terms.

Data deletion

On the client's request, case materials and derived artefacts are deleted. Terms and timelines are fixed in the pilot agreement.

Verifiable sources

Every key conclusion in Litigence is linked to a specific document or fragment. The lawyer can open the source and see the highlight — no black boxes.

Lawyer control

Litigence makes no legal decisions. The final position, wording and filing of documents are always the lawyer's. This is fixed in the pilot terms.

No outcome promises

We don't predict the court's ruling and don't promise a result. All system metrics are about position readiness, evidence completeness and risk coverage.

Corporate environment

For teams that require isolated infrastructure, we discuss a closed corporate environment. The architecture is agreed individually for the pilot.

Limitation of liability

Litigence is an intelligent assistant. Its output requires professional legal review before any documents are filed. Terms are fixed in the contract.

Ready to discuss a pilot
for your security perimeter?

We agree the NDA and data-handling terms before any work starts. Tell us what your security team requires — we'll shape the format.

The final security architecture for pilot clients is agreed individually.